This is Ritchiel, the author of our second and final entry on chapter 3, and her sisters. She said, "This picture was taken in the Philippines. I believe I was six years old." She explained that she wishes she had more pictures, but her mom told her that most of them are still in the Philippines. Her second oldest sister, Cherry Ann, is on the far left; Lorely, the oldest, is in the middle; Raciel, the third oldest, is on the far right; and Ritchiel is "last, but not least." Enjoy reading Ritchiel's take on what Hirsh-Pasek and Golinkoff had to say in chapter 3.
The authors did an amazing job in this chapter describing how toddlers learn how to do addition and subtraction. As soon as I began reading the passage, I realized how children learn differently and that much of the time, they will not give the right answer.
In the beginning of the passage, Hirsh-Pasek and Golinkoff told a little story about a mother who was reading the newspaper and discovered that, “infants can perform addition and subtraction” (p. 38). As soon as I read the passage, I read it again just to make sure I read it right, and I did. I stopped and thought, how can an infant learn to do addition and subtraction at such a young age? How is it even possible for them to process that in their brain when they’re barely learning how to suck their thumb or their bottles? When you think about it, it would be good if it were true that an infant can perform at such a young age. Of course we all want our children to be smart and give them the best path to succeed in their education (I don‘t have children yet), because if we don’t we’re the ones to blame.
As the chapter continues, it begins discussing the results from some research, and some ideas for helping children learn how addition and subtraction work. Studies show that children can learn how to do addition and subtraction. Professor Janellen Huttenlocher did a study with toddlers, and it was a success. The same success occurred when she did her studies on monkeys. I thought it was a brilliant idea to use an object instead of using flash cards to show a child how the equation works. But, I still disagree with Professor Janellen Huttenlocher’s research, because I do believe that children tend to memorize a word, such as three, as the “name” for everything, and would do the same with color. For instance, a child might think “red” is the name for all colors. The child needs to learn through experience that three don’t mean that every item is going to be three.
I began reflecting on my former job as a preschool teacher three years ago. The first time I started working at the preschool, I was very surprised that children who were 5 and/or about to start kindergarten must learn their ABC’s, numbers to 30, shapes, sight words, and must know how to write their name. I felt really bad for the children, because they were loaded with a ton of homework and they’re not even in grade school. It seemed to me like they were not given the time and space to enjoy their childhood. It seemed to me like they skipped the childhood stage and jumped into the adult stage. When I was in preschool in the Philippines, I remember just playing a lot and of course learning my ABC’s, numbers, etc. As a child, I learned by playing. I’ve never seen children put under pressure as much as I saw it while working at the preschool for three years. Preschool should be fun for children, which is the way I remember it. You can always combine learning and playing at the same time. Hirsh- Pasek and Golinkoff wrote that, “Children learn much better through play” (p.58). I think this is the most important part of learning.
Reading this passage has made me realize more about how children are put under pressure to learn. I think it’s great that school has high standards for their students because it will benefit them later as they go on with their schooling. But you can’t forget that children are still children, they’re not robots. Children cannot program themselves to learn something in a second once the teacher explains it once. Children need different objects to manipulate, so the children will have a better understanding of what is happening. Also children need to learn to communicate with their peers or others, and their motor skills needs to be practiced as well. Make learning fun for children. Throw in some fun activities that you could do with them; in that way you will meet your goal as a teacher, and of course your children will be having fun and not stressing out about learning new things.
Ritchiel I agree with you when you stated that as soon as you started reading chapter 3, you began to question how it was possible for infants to know how to add and subtract at such a young age. I had the same reaction you did. I began to question how it was possible for infants to do mathematical operations. As crazy as it sounds, people actually believe infants are capable of understanding mathematical principles. Then something else crossed my mind, I began to think about children in other countries and how they might not have flash cards or video s to teach infants or toddlers how to count. Many young children who are less fortunate in other countries don’t have all the fancy tools that are exposed by the media in today’s society. Kids in other countries who are less fortunate play with rocks, stick, and other simple objects. I agree with the author that children need physical, concrete objects to learn. They have to be able to experience it, to grasp mathematical principles. I also agree with the author when she stated that children learn by play instead of being bombarded with loads of abstract information that infants are unable of understanding during the sensory motor stage. I enjoyed reading your blog, I really like the way you compared the day care and your childhood in the Philippines, to the one you’ve worked here in Fresno.
ReplyDeleteI didn't know that infants could count until one of my child development teachers showed the class a video of how the infants reacted to addition and subtraction. It was shocking to realize how the infant’s face changed when the experimenter put one stuffed animal behind the blackboard and then added another one, but when the board opened there were three instead of two. I mean it’s amazing how infants knew addition and subtraction, but a lot of parents just don’t know. I do agree with you that when children are learning how to add and subtract, using manipulative objects would make them learn more instead of flash cards. Using objects is more interactive, fun and the children will learn better than flash cards. One sad thing was that I never went to preschool and never experienced what it was really like. However, the rest of my younger sisters did go to preschool and I got to tour their class when I was young. I used to work at a preschool and thought to myself, “I would have enjoyed going to preschool if I had the chance to.” Hnou Moua
ReplyDelete